Tag Archives: parents rights

The initiatives: Restoring parents’ rights and protecting girls’ sports

Watch my weekly video update.

 

Dear Friends and Neighbors,

You may have heard that two citizen-led initiatives have been certified recently and are now before the Legislature. If passed, one would restore parents’ rights to know what’s happening to their children in public school (IL26-001).The other would ban biological boys living as transgender girls from competing in girls’ sports (IL26-638).

Let’s take a closer look.

Restoring parents’ rights (IL2-001): This bill seeks to restore and reenact the “Parents’ Bill of Rights,” which was passed by the Legislature in 2024 as Initiative 2081 and partially repealed by Democrats in 2025. This proposal would ensure parents have the right to review all educational materials, access their children’s medical and mental-health records, and be notified before medical services are provided to their children at school.

As a parent of four, this seems pretty commonsense to me. We don’t give up our rights to information about our children and their education the moment they step into a classroom. Teachers and administrators should not be allowed to keep secrets from parents about their children’s wellbeing or any medical interventions being led by school staff unless that child is being abused.

Last year, the Majority gutted the parents’ rights bill that had passed the year before. As a result,  schools can delay telling you about safety/criminal issues involving your child for up to 48 hours after an incident. They can withhold certain mental-health and medical information. And your right to opt your child out of certain curriculum materials is very narrow.

Ironically, in 2024, the initial Parents’ Bill of Rights passed unanimously in the Senate and received an 82-15 bipartisan vote in the House of Representatives – yet many of those who supported I-2081 turned around and voted to weaken it less than a year after the law had taken effect. The effort to hide things from parents is led by special-interest groups who claim to have your children’s best interest at heart, but actually serve an agenda rejected by most.

 

Banning biological boys from girls’ sports (IL26-638): This initiative aims to prohibit “biologically male” students from participating in school-sponsored sports designated for female students. It would require students to provide a statement from a healthcare provider verifying their biological sex based on reproductive anatomy, genetics, or natural testosterone levels. A genetic test would be a simple cheek swab or blood test, and a testosterone test would also be run from a blood sample.

This initiative upholds the original intent of Title IX, which was to provide women and girls with dedicated opportunities to compete. Allowing biological males into these categories can displace female athletes, rolling back 54 years of hard-fought civil rights protections for women and girls.

The primary goal is to preserve a level playing field. Scientific data indicates that biological males typically possess physiological advantages that persist even after hormone therapy.

As of early this year, 27 states have passed laws restricting sports participation based on biological sex. Washington would be joining a growing national consensus on fairness in women’s sports. National polling consistently shows that 68-70% of Americans believe transgender athletes should compete on teams that match their biological sex, so this should also be considered a common-sense policy.

How can you share your thoughts?

Majority Democrats have refused to hold a public hearing on either initiative, despite the Washington State Constitution declaring that addressing initiatives is the top priority for the Legislature other than budget legislation.

However, you can sign in as PRO or CON on the initiatives by clicking or scanning the QR code below.

 

Scan this code or click on it to sign in as PRO or CON for the initiatives.

 

You can also submit written comments online. Choose one of these links and click on the button that says “Send comment to your legislators.”

Banning biological boys from girls’ sports (IL26-638)

Restoring parents’ rights (IL2-001):

If you have questions or concerns, you can email me at john.braun@leg.wa.gov.

Sincerely,

Senator John Braun

 

An attack on your right to direct Democracy

During the 2025 and 2026 legislative sessions, Democrats sponsored two bills that aim to severely curtail the ability of the citizens of Washington to file initiatives to the Legislature — a constitutional right that gives the people the power to change specific policies.

We call the bills “Initiative Killer” and “Initiative Killer 2.0.” In line with the colorful nicknames, these two bills are a threat to the people’s right to engage in direct democracy.

Initiative Killer (Senate Bill 5382): Requires signature gatherers circulating initiative and referendum petitions to sign declarations as to the validity of the signatures, for which they would be personally liable. This is despite no evidence of a single invalid signature having been counted on an initiative. Similar legislation in Oregon more than tripled the cost to qualify an initiative (to $500,000, instead of $150,000).

Initiative Killer 2.0 (Senate Bill 5973): Prohibits signature gatherers from being paid for each signature collected and requires a minimum of 1,000 signatures to be submitted when the initiative is proposed — even before the minimum 400,000 signatures to file it can be collected. This would disincentivize people from working as signature gatherers and it would slow down, or even stop, the filing process.

Several years ago, Democrats managed to pass other legislation that limited voters’ ability to weigh in on specific policy by banning “advisory votes.” These would appear on the ballot as a list of taxes passed by Democrats and voters could then say whether or not they thought any should be repealed. While these votes were strictly advisory and did not actually repeal taxes, they put a spotlight on government greed and uncontrolled spending.

Arguing that voters were easily confused by advisory votes, Democrats successfully fought to eliminate them, effectively keeping people in the dark while they dug deeper into our pockets.

In news articles before this year’s session began, Democrat leaders claimed voters gave them the majority in the Legislature, therefore they had a mandate to proceed with their agenda – whatever that might include. That’s false: there was no statewide vote to put Democrats in control, the voters chose on a district-by-district basis — and Democrats simply won more of those seats than Republicans. And any time individual policies in that agenda are called into question by the people, Democrats resist the scrutiny.

What are they afraid of? Are they worried that the people of Washington want transparency and accountability, including the chance to directly rewrite specific policy they don’t like?

Whether or not you support either one of the initiatives currently before the Legislature is not the point. You might support one next year or the year after that, and as Democrats continue their efforts to undermine the process of direct democracy, they undermine your rights as well.

You can help protect the citizen-initiative process and stop these bills.

Contact the chair of the Senate Committee on State Government, Tribal Affairs and Elections. He’s also the prime sponsor of the Initiative Killer bills.

 

NEWSLETTER: Democrats undermining your right to know

Watch my weekly legislative update:

Friends and Neighbors,

Nearly 500,000 Washington voters signed on to Initiative 2081, knowns as the Parents’ Bill of Rights. Last session, legislators on both sides of the aisle, including me, spoke in favor of the initiative and why it was a positive step. It passed with bipartisan support.

Fast forward to this session. In a move that ignores the will of the people and undermines the purpose of the law to protect parents’ “right to know,” Democrats are moving bills forward that would weaken that right.

The most concerning of these is Senate Bill 5181. This bill has many problems, such as lengthening the time the school has to notify you if your child is attacked. It also creates some exceptions to when schools even have to notify parents.

When current law limits minor access to tanning beds and tattoo parlors, why are we limiting parents’ knowledge of their children’s medical issues.

Listen to my legislative update on this issue.

All parents should worry about this effort.

My weekly column in The Chronicle elaborates on SB 5181 and what it really means for our state. Read my full column.

If you want to share your opposition to this bill, contact the following legislators who have control over what happens to this bill — and your right to know.

 

LISTEN: Official Podcast

Our caucus produces an official podcast that is a great way to hear about what’s happening in the Legislature. It’s called The Elephant in the Dome.

In this episode, our staff hosts and I delve into Democrat efforts to limit parental rights, and the challenges and opportunities in education founding. I also talk about my vision for a reimagining of The Evergreen State College.

Read my news release about my proposal to close Evergreen and turn it into a South Sound UW campus dedicated to training medical workers to care for the 3.2 million Washingtonians who will be part of a “Silver Tsunami” in five years that will overwhelm our health-care system.

Listen to additional episodes on our website.

Another firsthand look at conditions at Green Hill

I talk a lot about what happens at the Green Hill School, the juvenile justice facility in Chehalis, because it has been riddled with serious overcrowding and poor management protocols — two things that have made it a dangerous and unproductive rehabilitation environment.

At the invitation of Sen. Leonard Christian, 4th Legislative District, I accompanied him on another tour of Green Hill. He is the current lead Republican on the Senate Human Services Committee, which is assigned to consider bills related to Green Hill and my bill that would repeal JR-25— the policy that allows residents convicted of a crime as a minor to remain at the facility until age 25 rather than transfer to a jail run by the Department of Corrections. Green Hill is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Children, Youth and Families.

We have a duty to the residents in the program to keep them safe and prepare them to face a brighter future when they are released. We also have a responsibility to keep staff safe in the workplace, and set them up for success with a solid policy framework. I’ll continue to update you on this as my bills progress, as well as others that seek to improve conditions.

A safer Washington: Hiring more law enforcement officers

A dubious distinction for Washington is that we remain dead last of all 50 states in the number of law-enforcement officers per capita protecting the people.

Fixing that remains a top priority for my caucus and me. My colleague, Sen. Jeff Holy, 6th Legislative District, sponsored two bills this session to provide state funding and incentivize county and local government to hire more officers.

Senate Bill 5285 incentivizes cities and counties to contribute additional funding toward hiring officers by allowing them to impose a 0.10 percent sales tax to pay for it. The bill would protect that money by mandating that the funds be spent ONLY on hiring law enforcement officers.

Senate Bill 5060 provides $100 million in grants to help fund salaries for new officers. This bill received a hearing and passed out of committee. We expect to see it come to the floor soon for a vote.

Gov. Ferguson gave Sen. Holy a shoutout during his inaugural speech during the opening week of legislative session, saying he wanted to work with him on this issue and would not sign a budget that did not contain that funding.

Both bills have bipartisan support and are working their way through the legislative process. I hope to announce that both of these bills have been signed by the governor sooner rather than later. Washington will be safer for it. Stay tuned and watch their progress.