Tag Archives: initiatives

NEWSLETTER: Standing up for freedom of the modern press

I have received many emails and calls from constituents who had seen social media posts or heard a podcast from political reporter Brandi Kruse explaining how she had been denied a press pass by the House of Representatives in Olympia.

To be clear, she was not denied a press pass by the Senate, nor is she the only reporter to be discriminated against by the House. Two others whose names may be familiar to you — Ari Hoffman and Jonathan Choe – were banned, as well. Because this situation has generated strong reactions, I want you to know my position on it.

Read the letter from the House of Representatives denying Brandi Kruse a press pass. 

A free and independent press is essential to a healthy democracy. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press are foundational principles, and they apply regardless of whether a journalist works for a large legacy outlet or operates independently. As traditional media has declined, independent journalists and new media voices have stepped in to inform the public, ask hard questions, and hold government accountable. That work should matter to everyone.

While the House of Representatives and the Senate are separate bodies with separate rules and procedures, we want to be clear about the Senate’s approach. The Washington State Senate has not denied press credentials to any journalist based on viewpoint or political perspective.

The Senate relies on journalists to self-attest to their status, and we do not impose ideological tests for access. I have also formally given my approval for credentialed members of the press to have access to the hallway (known as the “wings”) adjacent to the Republican side of the Senate chamber, consistent with Senate rules.

Reasonable people can disagree on policy and politics but restricting a reporter’s access to lawmakers based on perceptions about his or her personal views sets a concerning precedent. Transparency, open debate, and a diversity of voices strengthen public trust in government rather than weaken it.

Your feedback is important, and concerns like yours help reinforce why these principles deserve continued attention and defense.

If you have questions or comments, please email me at john.braun@leg.wa.gov. 

Sincerely,

John Braun

 

 

Bill status: Protecting kids from fentanyl

Senate Bill 5071, my bill to add fentanyl and other synthetic opioids to the child endangerment law, was passed by the Senate more than two weeks ago. Yet for the fourth year in a row, this legislation is stuck in committee in the House of Representatives, waiting for a hearing.

This time around, an amendment was added to the bill that would allow parental support and other services as consequences for a first offense instead of prison. The sentences for subsequent offenses would be up to the courts to decide.

I sincerely hope that, with this amendment, the Democrat chair of the House Committee on Community Safety finally gives this bill a hearing and moves it out of committee so the full House can vote on it.

If it becomes law, this legislation will not criminalize addiction. Substance-use disorder is a disease that traps people in a vicious downward spiral, but it doesn’t absolve them from the consequences of endangering their child by exposing them to drugs that can kill them.

With the increase in the use of fentanyl, especially given how lethal it and other synthetic opioids are, it is important to update the law by adding them to the list of drugs (such as methamphetamine) in the Child Endangerment Act.

You can contact the chair of the committee to ask him to hold a hearing on the bill – and move it forward.

 

 

 

My bills the Democrat majority will not advance

 

 

 

JUVENILE JUSTICE

Senate Bill 5278: My bill to alleviate crowding at juvenile-justice facilities such as Green Hill School in Chehalis and Echo Glen Childrens Center outside Snoqualmie passed the Senate last year but died in the House because a Democrat senator asked House Democrats to kill it — even though she voted for it. I reintroduced the bill this year and majority Democrats in the Senate ignored it completely. The continued rejection of this legislation means dangerous overcrowding will continue at these facilities.

 

EXPANDING NUCLEAR ENERGY

Senate Bill 5821:  This bill would have added advanced nuclear energy to the State Energy Strategy released in 2021. It also would have required the Department of Commerce to supplement the strategy with a “nuclear power strategic” framework. If our electrical grid is going to meet the demands of the future, especially given the increasing power needs of artificial intelligence, we have to expand access to nuclear strategy. The Senate’s energy committee held a hearing but let the bill die.

 

RESTORING FUNDING FOR CANCER RESEARCH

Senate Bill 6116: Last year, a tax bill targeting synthetic nicotine products (an example is Zyn) swept up a tax on vapor products that provided $45 million for cancer research during the two years prior. My bill would have restored the funding mechanism to the way it was before the passage of SB 5814, ensuring that funding goes to fighting cancer. This bill had a hearing in the Ways and Means committee in January but has yet to move forward.

 

ELIMINATING THE WAIT LIST FOR SERVICES FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED INDIVIDUALS

Senate Bill 6163: This bill would require the expense of services for developmentally disabled individuals and their families to be included in future “maintenance level” budgets automatically. It would prevent a repeat of Governor Ferguson’s decision not to include these services in his maintenance budget, resulting in nearly 500 families who are eligible for services to be waitlisted due to a lack of funding. This is completely unacceptable. SB 6163 received a hearing in Ways and Means but no vote yet. Read more about my stance on this issue.

 

HOUSING GRANT FRAUD

Senate Bill 6205: Although my bill to prevent people from defrauding a publicly funded program to provide grants for homeownership received a hearing in the Senate Committee on Housing in January, the committee chair did not allow it to move out of committee before the Feb. 4 deadline for action on Senate policy bills. I fear this will allow people with insider connections to the nonprofits in charge of dispensing the program’s money to continue receiving grants that should go to others in need.

 

MAINTAINING FISH STOCK DESPITE HATCHERY CLOSURES

Senate Bill 6207: Despite the ongoing struggle to increase the population of steelhead trout in Washington waters, the Department of Fish and Wildlife is closing the Skamania Hatchery in Washougal. I believe the department needs to be held accountable for maintaining production of steelhead juveniles. This bipartisan bill would have required DFW to maintain production of certain fish stock even if it closes a hatchery, meaning the agency would need to increase production somewhere else.

 

 

Watch my weekly video update

 

Washington voters have rejected a state income tax 10 times — 11 if you include an advisory vote that also rejected the idea. But Democrats aren’t listening. They have proposed Senate Bill 6346, which is a statewide income tax that — at $4 billion per year — would dwarf all other tax increases.

Not only are Democrats rushing the bill through the Legislative process, they are only granting one hour for public comment and have included a clause in the bill that prevents voters from overturning it in referendum.

Sen. Chris Gildon, R-Puyallup, and I sent a letter to the Democrat chair of the Senate’s fiscal committee asking that the public comment time be expanded to at least two hours. She refused our request.

In addition to the income tax, other big news this week is that the listening sessions conducted by the Senate and House Republicans on the two initiatives to the Legislature were a big success. Thank you to everyone who came to Olympia to share your stories.

Watch my video update.

The initiatives: Restoring parents’ rights and protecting girls’ sports

Watch my weekly video update.

 

Dear Friends and Neighbors,

You may have heard that two citizen-led initiatives have been certified recently and are now before the Legislature. If passed, one would restore parents’ rights to know what’s happening to their children in public school (IL26-001).The other would ban biological boys living as transgender girls from competing in girls’ sports (IL26-638).

Let’s take a closer look.

Restoring parents’ rights (IL2-001): This bill seeks to restore and reenact the “Parents’ Bill of Rights,” which was passed by the Legislature in 2024 as Initiative 2081 and partially repealed by Democrats in 2025. This proposal would ensure parents have the right to review all educational materials, access their children’s medical and mental-health records, and be notified before medical services are provided to their children at school.

As a parent of four, this seems pretty commonsense to me. We don’t give up our rights to information about our children and their education the moment they step into a classroom. Teachers and administrators should not be allowed to keep secrets from parents about their children’s wellbeing or any medical interventions being led by school staff unless that child is being abused.

Last year, the Majority gutted the parents’ rights bill that had passed the year before. As a result,  schools can delay telling you about safety/criminal issues involving your child for up to 48 hours after an incident. They can withhold certain mental-health and medical information. And your right to opt your child out of certain curriculum materials is very narrow.

Ironically, in 2024, the initial Parents’ Bill of Rights passed unanimously in the Senate and received an 82-15 bipartisan vote in the House of Representatives – yet many of those who supported I-2081 turned around and voted to weaken it less than a year after the law had taken effect. The effort to hide things from parents is led by special-interest groups who claim to have your children’s best interest at heart, but actually serve an agenda rejected by most.

 

Banning biological boys from girls’ sports (IL26-638): This initiative aims to prohibit “biologically male” students from participating in school-sponsored sports designated for female students. It would require students to provide a statement from a healthcare provider verifying their biological sex based on reproductive anatomy, genetics, or natural testosterone levels. A genetic test would be a simple cheek swab or blood test, and a testosterone test would also be run from a blood sample.

This initiative upholds the original intent of Title IX, which was to provide women and girls with dedicated opportunities to compete. Allowing biological males into these categories can displace female athletes, rolling back 54 years of hard-fought civil rights protections for women and girls.

The primary goal is to preserve a level playing field. Scientific data indicates that biological males typically possess physiological advantages that persist even after hormone therapy.

As of early this year, 27 states have passed laws restricting sports participation based on biological sex. Washington would be joining a growing national consensus on fairness in women’s sports. National polling consistently shows that 68-70% of Americans believe transgender athletes should compete on teams that match their biological sex, so this should also be considered a common-sense policy.

How can you share your thoughts?

Majority Democrats have refused to hold a public hearing on either initiative, despite the Washington State Constitution declaring that addressing initiatives is the top priority for the Legislature other than budget legislation.

However, you can sign in as PRO or CON on the initiatives by clicking or scanning the QR code below.

 

Scan this code or click on it to sign in as PRO or CON for the initiatives.

 

You can also submit written comments online. Choose one of these links and click on the button that says “Send comment to your legislators.”

Banning biological boys from girls’ sports (IL26-638)

Restoring parents’ rights (IL2-001):

If you have questions or concerns, you can email me at john.braun@leg.wa.gov.

Sincerely,

Senator John Braun

 

An attack on your right to direct Democracy

During the 2025 and 2026 legislative sessions, Democrats sponsored two bills that aim to severely curtail the ability of the citizens of Washington to file initiatives to the Legislature — a constitutional right that gives the people the power to change specific policies.

We call the bills “Initiative Killer” and “Initiative Killer 2.0.” In line with the colorful nicknames, these two bills are a threat to the people’s right to engage in direct democracy.

Initiative Killer (Senate Bill 5382): Requires signature gatherers circulating initiative and referendum petitions to sign declarations as to the validity of the signatures, for which they would be personally liable. This is despite no evidence of a single invalid signature having been counted on an initiative. Similar legislation in Oregon more than tripled the cost to qualify an initiative (to $500,000, instead of $150,000).

Initiative Killer 2.0 (Senate Bill 5973): Prohibits signature gatherers from being paid for each signature collected and requires a minimum of 1,000 signatures to be submitted when the initiative is proposed — even before the minimum 400,000 signatures to file it can be collected. This would disincentivize people from working as signature gatherers and it would slow down, or even stop, the filing process.

Several years ago, Democrats managed to pass other legislation that limited voters’ ability to weigh in on specific policy by banning “advisory votes.” These would appear on the ballot as a list of taxes passed by Democrats and voters could then say whether or not they thought any should be repealed. While these votes were strictly advisory and did not actually repeal taxes, they put a spotlight on government greed and uncontrolled spending.

Arguing that voters were easily confused by advisory votes, Democrats successfully fought to eliminate them, effectively keeping people in the dark while they dug deeper into our pockets.

In news articles before this year’s session began, Democrat leaders claimed voters gave them the majority in the Legislature, therefore they had a mandate to proceed with their agenda – whatever that might include. That’s false: there was no statewide vote to put Democrats in control, the voters chose on a district-by-district basis — and Democrats simply won more of those seats than Republicans. And any time individual policies in that agenda are called into question by the people, Democrats resist the scrutiny.

What are they afraid of? Are they worried that the people of Washington want transparency and accountability, including the chance to directly rewrite specific policy they don’t like?

Whether or not you support either one of the initiatives currently before the Legislature is not the point. You might support one next year or the year after that, and as Democrats continue their efforts to undermine the process of direct democracy, they undermine your rights as well.

You can help protect the citizen-initiative process and stop these bills.

Contact the chair of the Senate Committee on State Government, Tribal Affairs and Elections. He’s also the prime sponsor of the Initiative Killer bills.